When you place football bets, including betway bets, it is tempting to focus on the scoreline and the league table. If a team wins three games in a row, you assume they’re going to be hard to beat next time, too. Meanwhile, if another side loses three times in a row, you think they are in trouble. The problem is that football is chaotic: shots hit the woodwork, keepers have great days, defenders make odd mistakes that are more down to the conditions than their overall ability. That is where expected goals comes in. xG strips away some of the randomness in football and shows you how many goals a team should have scored, based on the quality of chances they created. If you learn to read the gap between xG and real goals, you can spot teams who are riding their luck and teams that are being quietly undervalued; both matter when money is on the line.

What xG Actually Means, in Plain English

Expected goals is a simple idea, even if the name sounds technical. Every shot is given a value that describes the likelihood of it being scored, between 0.00 (being impossible) and 1.00 (being certain), usually down to two decimal points. A tap-in from three yards is worth a high number; a hopeful shot from thirty yards is worth very little. For context, a penalty is usually valued at around 0.76-0.79 xG, meaning it should be scored just over three-quarters of the time (if you think of the xG value as being much like a percentage of 1.00, i.e. in this case 76-79%).

Add up all those shot values and you get a team’s xG for the match. Lots of big chances and it might add up to above 2.00 or 3.00; very few clear-cut opportunities and it could easily be below 0.50. Over several games, that number becomes useful because it smooths out chaos. You are no longer asking, “did they score?”; you are asking, “did they create chances good enough to score?” That difference is very important because whilst goals can be few and far between, chances are more stable.

Teams Are Over-Performing When Goals Outrun Chances

Sometimes a team scores far more goals than its xG suggests it should. This usually happens because their strikers have a run of high-quality shooting, goalkeepers on the other side struggle or a few low-probability shots fly in. Early this season, Manchester City and Bayern Munich both scored noticeably more goals than their combined xG totals according to data updated during the winter period. That does not mean they are bad teams; it means their hot streaks are unlikely to last forever. For betting, this is crucial. Odds often shorten because results look strong, even when the underlying quality of chance creation has not improved. When you see this pattern, be cautious about backing short prices; the market may already be over-excited.

Under-Performing Teams Present Value, Hiding in Plain Sight

The opposite gap is often more interesting. Some teams can consistently create good chances that total solid xG numbers, but still fail to score. Real Madrid and Arsenal both recently went through stretches where their xG stayed high but actual goals lagged behind, the consequence being that results didn’t make them look as good as they really were. This is where patience pays off. Finishing tends to drift back toward average over time, or in other words, xG and actual goals re-align. If a team keeps getting into good positions, goals usually follow. For you, the bettor: that can mean great value odds for result or goal markets, that are longer than they really should be, often when recent scorelines make a side look weaker than it really is. This is exaggerated still further when lots of people are betting for the opposite to happen, and bookmakers have to adjust their odds to keep their potential losses down.

How This Gap Affects Common Betting Markets

Understanding xG helps you think beyond the classic home win, draw and away win match market. If a team’s xG is strong but goals are missing, markets like ‘Over 2.5 goals’ or ‘Both teams to score’ can become attractive to the shrewd football gambler; the chances are there and are likely to continue, even if the finishing hasn’t matched it just yet.

On the flip side, when goals are flowing without matching xG, clean sheets and low goal totals could be over-priced. The key is always to look at the evidence and try and read between the lines of previous results, to try to spot a team that’s been lucky, then choose bets that fit that story - especially if the odds given are suggesting the lucky team will continue to score or win.

Using xG Without Overthinking It

You don’t need spreadsheets or complex models to benefit from xG. Look at xG over a team’s last five or six matches, compare it to goals they’ve actually scored and ask one simple question: is there a clear gap? If yes, ask why. Injuries can matter; tactical changes can too; sometimes a striker really is elite, like Erling Haaland’s stats show, or indeed really bad! But most of the time, extreme gaps between xG and goals scored narrow over time. That is the edge. Keep notes, stay disciplined and resist being influenced by last weekend’s scoreline alone. xG is not magic, but used calmly alongside form and team news, it can sharpen your betting decisions and help you avoid the traps that catch casual bettors.

In football betting, the smartest gains often come from seeing what others miss. Expected goals exists to help you do exactly that, quietly and consistently.

Related Articles

Best Leagues for Draw Football Predictions in 2026

Football Betting Tips: Goals in a Row Prediction

Top 21 Prediction Sites in the World in 2025

How Football Prediction Sites Create the Best Football Tips

Football Betting Tips: Goals in a Row Prediction